Category Archives: The Giving Carnival

Flashback: Carnivals, Podcasts & More

This week I’m reviewing the history of Tactical Philanthropy and digging through the archives. You can see Monday’s post for more background.

One of the reasons I started Tactical Philanthropy was to have a platform to talk about philanthropy with other people. As a wealth manager, my professional network was not (prior to launching the blog) filled with people who were passionate about philanthropy. But blogs and other social media tools allow people of common interests to gather.

My first attempt to really get a cross-disciplinary conversation going was my Giving Carnival series. The first one is found below (published on January 23, 2007) and you can read the background here. Over time I replaced the Giving Carnival with my podcast series. You can see the way this format encouraged back and forth by visiting the comments section of my interview with Bill Schambra (got people a little riled up I’ll say!). The podcast series came to a peak when the United Way pitched me to interview their CEO Brian Gallagher. I’ve been thinking about my next step in facilitating cross-disciplinary debates about philanthropy and I’m currently strategizing an off-line event that I’ll be sharing here first in the coming weeks.

The Giving Carnival: Edition One

Welcome to the first edition of The Giving Carnival. The topic of this edition is the debate surrounding the LA Times coverage of The Gates Foundation investment policy (you can read the two part article here and here).

First up we have Phil Cubeta channeling Marxist Leon Trotsky in his post “Leon Trotsky on Socially Responsible Investing”.

Allison Fine calls The Gates Foundation “cowardly” in her post “Outrageous Behavior by The Gates Foundation”.

Lucy Bernholz reviews the various points of view on the topic of socially responsible investing and brings us a reader poll in her post “Foundations and Investing”.

Paul Botts brings us his thoughts with “A Thoughtful Response from Gates” and “More on Foundation Investment Practices”.

Carol Kirshner points out that “being a leader can suck at times” in her post “GatesGate: Conscious Spending and Investing”.

Holden Karnofsky says “I’m basically fine with investing in evil” and then adds “More Thoughts on Responsible Investing” and finally “One More Thing”.

I weigh in with “Private Foundation Investment Strategy” and a post I wrote before the discussion hit firestorm status “The Gates Foundation”.

And finally Jed Emerson (who doesn’t update his blog with the manic frequency of the other Carnival participants) points us to his Op-Ed on the subject in The Chronicle of Philanthropy, “Maximizing Our Missions”.

Thanks to everyone for sending in your submissions. The response was so positive that I’d like to make The Giving Carnival a bi-weekly event. This is going to be a traveling carnival meaning that future editions will be hosted by other Giving Blogs in addition to being hosted here.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Why Do People Give to Charity?

Jason Dick, who blogs at A Small Change, is hosting this month’s Giving Carnival. He’s also created a Google Group for the Giving Carnival to make it easy for people to stay up to date on future events and sign up to host (I’m amazed how the Carnival has grown since I started it with a handful of contributions in Jan 2007 when we debated the Gates Foundation investment policy and socially responsible investing!).

The premise of the February 2008 edition of the Giving Carnival is “What motivates giving?”.

I believe that giving is motivated by humans’ deeply held need to find meaning in life. For most people, meaning is deeply intertwined with community connections (defining community as narrowly as family to the full community of life). Humans want to feel a sense of connection and a sense of purpose to life. Giving (time, money, energy) is a central way that we strive to find meaning.

Much has been made of selfish motivations behind giving. No doubt some giving is motived by selfishness. However, if we look to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (a central theory of what drives human behavior) we find that while humans are driven by items that benefit them, once these needs (food, sleep, security, etc) are met, they are driven by the desire for self-actualization. Maslow describes self-actualizing people:

    * They embrace the facts and realities of the world (including themselves) rather than denying or avoiding them.
    * They are spontaneous in their ideas and actions.
    * They are creative.
    * They are interested in solving problems; this often includes the problems of others. Solving these problems is             often a key focus in their lives.
    * They feel a closeness to other people, and generally appreciate life.
    * They have a system of morality that is fully internalized and independent of external authority.
    * They have discernment and are able to view all things in an objective manner.

To me, this is a wonderful description of the very best philanthropists.

Because what is good for our community is good for each of us (in that individuals in thriving, happy communities are generally happier themselves), there is a way in which giving comes back to benefit the giver. This feedback loop is wonderful, but I believe that humans’ motivation to give is rooted in their desire to find meaning through community, not the hope that doing so will benefit them.

All of this is my thoughts on what motivations humans to give. The motivations of each individual giver are of course unique. But just as we eat to satisfy our desire to live, we give to satisfy our desire for meaning.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival

The next Giving Carnival will be hosted by Seeking Grant Money Today. The deadline for submission is October 15. Arlene Spencer describes this edition’s topic:

The topic for this Giving Carnival is… Are relationships "everything" in philanthropy, today? Here are some questions to get you thinking: If philanthropic relationships are not everything, what is critical to philanthropy’s modern success? Who do relationships in philanthropy form between today, compared to the past? Where is the innovation, in developing relationships in philanthropy? How do modern relationships in philanthropy begin; and how are they maintained? Who or what do they matter for? What are philanthropic relationships’ effects on the causes they are supposed to serve? Is their oversight of relationships in philanthropy, and if so, what are the checks and balances on them? Are there times that relations should be broken, and if so, in what situations?

You don’t need a blog to be involved! If you don’t have a blog, just post your response to the October 2007 Giving Carnival topic as a "Comment", below, on this blog post; or email me your response at aspencer at thegrantplant dot com, and I’ll post it on the Giving Carnival response post, for you. Otherwise, please blog about whether relationships are "everything" in philanthropy, today, and email me the link to your post. I’ll post your link, along with everyone else’s!

So head on over and give Arlene you submission.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival

A record 22 submissions are in this month’s Giving Carnival on the blog Fundraising for Nonprofits. The topic is Predicting the Future of Fundraising.

I’ll be posting my take on the contributions next week. You should go check them out now.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival: Fundraising for Nonprofits

Gayle Roberts will be hosting the next Giving Carnival on her blog Fundraising for Nonprofits:

I’ll be featuring a collection of links to all submitted blog posts and comments on the topic of “Predicting the Future of Fundraising.”

Building off one of this blog’s most popular past articles, I invite you to take a trip with me 10 years into the future. How will the fundraising profession look like a decade from now? How have some of today’s biggest trends such as Internet technology, social entrepreneurialism and globalization changed our jobs? From the tax code to global warming, how has the environment in which we operate changed? Has the much predicted pending leadership crisis occurred, and if so, what has been the impact?

She gives directions for participants in her announcement. The deadline is September 4. Unlike most blog carnivals, you don’t need your own blog to participate in the Giving Carnival. You can always submit your thoughts in the comments section of each carnival announcement.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival: GiveWell

Holden Karnofsky’s GiveWell blog hosts the return of the Giving Carnival and ask the question, “What charitable cause are you personally most passionate about?”

He got a large response. Check it out.

If you’re interested in hosting a future Giving Carnival, email the current host.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants

Katya Andresen’s Nonprofit Marketing Blog is hosting the current Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants (which is the inspiration behind The Giving Carnival, currently accepting submissions on GiveWell). Katya decided to have a little fun this week:

I invited savvy bloggers to submit their “top five” lists.  Top five wisecracks, top five wise insights, top five anything—and I offered lavish praise to those creative enough to somehow work into their posts the words “bikini,” “martini” or “Fellini.”

The response was amazing – this is great big, “fabulous five” carnival that I hope you will enjoy.  And if you find this list very long – or are overwhelmed just keeping up with the field – start with Sean of Tactical Philanthropy’s great Top Five Ways to Know Everything about Philanthropy.

I especially liked Britt Bravo’s Top Five Things to Ask When Your Nonprofit Wants to Start a Community (which applies well to foundations that are exploring social media tools and public engagement).

After you read through the Carnival, head on over to GiveWell and submit your answer to the question: What charitable cause are you personally most passionate about?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival

The Giving Carnival is back! The GiveWell blog is the first stop on what is now a traveling event.

This week’s topic is: what charitable cause are you personally most passionate about?

Please post a comment to this post by midnight of 8/4/07, either linking to your post or containing your response. If you have your own blog, link to your post and include a summary. If you don’t, or want to be anonymous, or just don’t want this on your blog, you can fully participate by comment. I will publish my own roundup the next week, but this way everyone will be able to see the unedited version.

If you want to host a future Giving Carnival, email Holden.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The Giving Carnival: Edition One

I’m on vacation this week. This post originally appeared on January 23, 2007. This first edition of the Giving Carnival brought together many of the philanthropy bloggers. Bill Schambra created a panel discussion at the Hudson Institute about aligned investing after reading the Giving Carnival posts and invited Allison Fine and Lucy Bernholz to sit on the panel.

I’ve morphed the Giving Carnival into my podcasts, but if any other philanthropy bloggers want to revive the Giving Carnival in its original format, let me know and I’d be happy to hand it over.

The Giving Carnival: Edition One

Welcome to the first edition of The Giving Carnival. The topic of this edition is the debate surrounding the LA Times coverage of The Gates Foundation investment policy (you can read the two part article here and here).

Thanks to everyone for sending in your submissions. The response was so positive that I’d like to make The Giving Carnival a bi-weekly event. This is going to be a traveling carnival meaning that future editions will be hosted by other Giving Blogs in addition to being hosted here.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Reviving the Giving Carnival

When I started the Giving Carnival, the intention was to facilitate discussion between philanthropy bloggers. It seemed to work rather well, but I quickly realized that the discussion was too much of a closed loop. I’ve written at length about my interest (obsession?) with cross-disciplinary conversations and approaches to solving problems. So I stopped producing the Giving Carnival and thought about how I might open the discussion to include non-bloggers and even non-blog readers (hat tip to Phil Cubeta for his suggestion that is at the root of the new format).

Today I’m happy to announce that I am merging the Tactical Philanthropy Podcast and the Giving Carnival (with a hat tip to Jesse and Anand of Innovatorz for getting me to think about how to make it easy for non-tech geeks to use social media tools). Tomorrow’s interview is with Paul Shoemaker of Social Venture Partners. Paul has agreed to respond to comments/questions from readers/listeners. Simply drop a comment or email me your thoughts. Soon I’m going to require interviewees to agree to this format. I’ll be announcing upcoming guests and asking for readers to submit questions they’d like me to ask. If you have guests you’d like to hear from, let me know.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post