Category Archives: Community Foundations

Leveraging Expertise in Philanthropy

Here’s an example of a way that donors with knowledge about a specific area of social impact can leverage their knowledge by sharing it with other donors. This comes from Social Venture Partners Rhode Island, but it is a format that any group with domain expertise in a particular grantmaking arena could copy.

Leveraged Investments in High-Potential Social Enterprise

Want to participate in Rhode Island’s growing social enterprise movement? Consider SVPRI’s Social Enterprise Investment Fund. The fund, which will be formally announced at the SERI Summit (November 12, 2009 at Bryant University), seeks to maximize social return on investment (SROI) through qualified investments leveraged by hands-on human capital in business models that help sustain the mission of high-quality non-profits.

The fund will invest in social enterprises that are "non-profit owned, mission-driven businesses which seek to maximize the efficiency, sustainability and social impact of its non-profit parent.” An investment in social enterprise is different from a contribution in a social program. It is an investment in the long-term success of the organization and its ability to best serve its clients and stakeholders. Each investment is leveraged with a team of SVP partners providing pro bono consulting services, so that non-profits benefit from access to the growing institutional knowledge and significant social capital of the SVPRI human capital network.

Investment Units

A full investment unit – with voting privileges and a partnership for two in SVPRI — is $5000. Smaller investments, including half shares, are available. A portion of each investment provides working capital for building the team and managing the process. For more information, please contact Chuck Holland, SVPRI Board Chair.

So let’s run with this idea for a minute. There are 24 Social Venture Partners chapters and over 2,000 members. With this fund, the Rhode Island chapter is effectively unleashing their knowledge, making it available to the public and offering to steward any gifts made by the public since they are already providing services beyond the grant to the nonprofits they support.

In effect, this sets SVPRI on a path that potentially competes with community foundations. They are offering geographic specific advice on outstanding nonprofits without requiring that donors place the money with them (such as in a donor advised fund) and they are doing it for free. Why for free? Because information about social impact becomes more valuable as it spreads since the “owner” of the knowledge generates social value when other investors use their knowledge.

Of course, SVPRI’s fund will not offer personalized one-on-one consulting. They are not getting into the relationship management game. But they are “unbundling” information about which nonprofits are doing a good job from the administration and relationship management services that have traditionally been bundled within community foundations.

One of the underlying premises of Tactical Philanthropy Advisors is that high end advisors to major donors no longer need to have a geographic focus because geographic focus is only relevant in regards to grantee information and today we’re witnessing a massive trend towards sharing knowledge about grantees.

On Friday, I’ll be at the Social Venture Partners conference in Dallas. One of the session I’m leading will be on SVP’s potential role in sector-wide initiatives. I think the new fund being launched by the Rhode Island chapter is a fascinating example of how SVP (and other smart grantmakers) can leverage their knowledge and engage with the sector as a whole.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Mission Related Investing for Individuals

In my column on the future of wealth management and philanthropy that appeared in Wealth Manager magazine last November I wrote:

Mission related investing (MRI) is the term used to describe investments made by philanthropic entities in the pursuit of both financial and social returns. Unlike traditional socially responsible investing that relies on “negative screening”—the avoidance of public companies that do not pass certain social criteria—MRI implies proactively seeking investment opportunities that produce a blend of financial returns and social impact that are in line with the philanthropy’s mission. Still an emergent issue, MRI is characterized by limited deal flow, especially in deals that have minimums low enough to allow widespread participation. But MRI brings philanthropic advising directly into the domain of the wealth manager.

Today, it appears that the Calvert Giving Fund has taken a significant step towards increased deal flow and lower minimums that should make it much easier for wealth individuals and smaller foundations to participate in a strategy that has largely been the domain of institutional foundations.

The Calvert Giving Fund is a national donor advised fund. Like Schwab Charitable, Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund and the Vanguard Charitable Endowment, Calvert provides low cost donor advised fund administration without providing advice on where to give. While structured as a nonprofit, the group is affiliated with Calvert Investments, a leader in socially responsible investing.

For some time the Calvert Giving Fund has offered social responsible investment options to their donor advised funds, as well as “community investment notes” that pay a below market rate of return and finance community development projects. Now they’ve added a Global Impact Ventures Platform. The platform currently offers access to five mission related investment options:

  • Acumen Fund: 10 year Senior Note (debt), 3% interest either paid or compounded into the principal
  • LeapFrog Investments: Equity Investment into Limited Partnership with 10 year life
  • MicroVest: 7 year equity limited partnership
  • Public Radio Fund: Promissory Note, 3 years at 0% or 5 years at 4%
  • Root Capital: Promissory Note, 3 years at 3% or 3 years at 0%, senior tranche

The investments all offer social impact in addition to a financial return. You can read summaries of the social impact potential here.

The really big news is that there is a minimum of only $25,000 to invest in each fund. Community foundations and national donor advised funds have a huge opportunity in the MRI space, because they can aggregate their donor/client’s investments into an investment in a fund like those above and count as a single investor. In other words, while a certain investment might have a $250,000 minimum, a community foundation or national donor advised fund can bring 10 of their donor advised funds in at $25,000 each and reach the minimum.

If an investment advisor or individual wants to invest in traditional profit driven investments, they can open an account at Schwab or Fidelity and have access to thousands of mutual funds, every publicly traded stock and bonds. If you buy stock, you don’t have to call the company, you buy it directly on the broker’s platform. Same thing if you buy a mutual fund. Now the Calvert Giving Fund has created a platform for mission related investing that integrates with existing financial markets.

Very cool. I hope that they are successful in marketing the program to advisors and individual philanthropists. I also hope that institutional foundations that care about mission related investing make some investment on the Calvert platform to help them grow.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Dorothy Reynolds on Community Foundations

Dorothy Reynolds has spent more than 20 years in the field of community-based philanthropy. Initially a senior staff member and CEO for community foundations in Ohio and Michigan, Reynolds has worked as a consultant for a number of philanthropic organizations for the past 11 years. She is also the author of three reports on community foundations published last month by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.

The reports are full of ammo for anyone engaging in the debate about my community foundation column. I would guess that if she was part of the debate on this blog, that Reynolds would join the chorus of community foundation employees who disagreed with my column. But I thought that this excerpt from one of her reports got to the core of the issue:

Since the early 1990s, commercial donor-advised funds — created by investment houses as “commercial charitable gift funds” — have offered new challenges to community foundations. The latter are unlikely to outperform the investment portfolio of a Fidelity or Vanguard Fund. And they never will be able to process grant suggestions as quickly as the commercial providers.


On the other hand, community foundations know their communities and the nonprofit sector and can offer donors valuable information and insight. That will continue to be their primary advantage over the commercial donor advised funds.

Every great business consultant will tell you to focus on your niche. Put all your efforts into that which you do best and quit everything else so that you can do the hard work to become the best in the world in your niche. At the core of my column about community foundations was my belief that they should quit those things that the commerical funds are good at and do what Reynolds says they do best: “offer donors valuable information and insight.”

Arguing for community foundations to partner with the commercials to outsource everything but “providing valuable information and insight” is not an insulting way to say that community foundations are not capable of doing these things. It is a arguement for them to focus on what they do best and quit everything else.

If you truly want to understand what I’m talking about and you want to build a world-class community foundation that will be celebrated as the best in the coming decades, go buy Seth Godin’s book The Dip: A Little Book That Teaches You When to Quit (and When to Stick) right now (it will only take you a couple of hours to read). As you’re reading it, realize that while community foundations are trying to be all things to all people, the pure donor advisors I mentioned in my column are busy pushing through the dip as they focus on the one thing they do best: “offering donors valuable information and insight.”

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post