<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hewlett Foundation Makes Grant to GiveWell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ani hurwitz</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/comment-page-1#comment-5657</link>
		<dc:creator>ani hurwitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1146#comment-5657</guid>
		<description>I just looked at givewell&#039;s instructions for its advanc donor program. the &quot;relationship&quot; with vanguard looks pretty cumbersome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked at givewell&#8217;s instructions for its advanc donor program. the &#8220;relationship&#8221; with vanguard looks pretty cumbersome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fruchterman</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/comment-page-1#comment-5654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Fruchterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1146#comment-5654</guid>
		<description>Oops.  Didn&#039;t see the clarification in the feed I read, so I failed to spot it when I commented.  Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  Didn&#8217;t see the clarification in the feed I read, so I failed to spot it when I commented.  Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/comment-page-1#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1146#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>Jim and Suzy, I posted a follow up on the Hewlett grant to explain my thinking more.

You can find it &lt;a href=&quot;http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim and Suzy, I posted a follow up on the Hewlett grant to explain my thinking more.</p>
<p>You can find it <a href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fruchterman</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/comment-page-1#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Fruchterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1146#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>I have the same reaction.  What does getting a $100,000 grant have to do with addressing research validity?  That caught my eye: I still don&#039;t know what the critiques were or are: all I know is that grants don&#039;t have anything to do with research validity...

And of course, the only thing I knew about GiveWell was that it had a scandal like the WholeFoods CEO scandal: anonymous internet pumping of an organization by its CEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same reaction.  What does getting a $100,000 grant have to do with addressing research validity?  That caught my eye: I still don&#8217;t know what the critiques were or are: all I know is that grants don&#8217;t have anything to do with research validity&#8230;</p>
<p>And of course, the only thing I knew about GiveWell was that it had a scandal like the WholeFoods CEO scandal: anonymous internet pumping of an organization by its CEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzy</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/hewlett-foundation-makes-grant-to-givewell/comment-page-1#comment-5636</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1146#comment-5636</guid>
		<description>&quot;This pretty much shuts down completely any argument around the validity of GiveWell’s research.&quot;  Really?  This from the man who advocates for foundations talking about their failures?  Are you really so sure this isn&#039;t one of those grants Hewlett will look back on and wonder...

As I read Givewell, there is still a lot of caveats, and best guesses going on.  I’ll let others argue the merits of the approach (as you have here) but I question letting such inexperienced folks carry the banner for empirical evaluation of nonprofit organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This pretty much shuts down completely any argument around the validity of GiveWell’s research.&#8221;  Really?  This from the man who advocates for foundations talking about their failures?  Are you really so sure this isn&#8217;t one of those grants Hewlett will look back on and wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>As I read Givewell, there is still a lot of caveats, and best guesses going on.  I’ll let others argue the merits of the approach (as you have here) but I question letting such inexperienced folks carry the banner for empirical evaluation of nonprofit organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
