Comments on: FORGE Goes “Mainstream” http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:16:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Leanne http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream/comment-page-1#comment-5177 Leanne Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:49:50 +0000 http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream#comment-5177 Kjerstin has my email as does Sean. I've offered to connect/help but not heard back. I'm willing to help you cross the gap if that's something you think you'd be interested in. What FORGE is doing matters, Nicholas. You and I and everyone else involved know it. I say we start taking charge of the message and sharing it with others. Kjerstin has my email as does Sean. I’ve offered to connect/help but not heard back. I’m willing to help you cross the gap if that’s something you think you’d be interested in.

What FORGE is doing matters, Nicholas. You and I and everyone else involved know it. I say we start taking charge of the message and sharing it with others.

]]> By: Nicholas Talarico http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream/comment-page-1#comment-5176 Nicholas Talarico Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:33:58 +0000 http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream#comment-5176 Hi Leanne. I have to say that I was also disappointed by the way we were presented in the article. It seems like the same thing has happened again... rather than focus on how FORGE as a whole considered the risks of this approach and weighed the benefits, the piece focuses on Kjerstin and an almost ‘dreamer’ mentality. There's no doubt that Kjerstin is a 'big picture' idealist, but she's also a highly-analytical, 'prove the model,' executive. That seems to be regularly lost in this story. I think the regression analysis posted by Kjerstin on The Social Edge is worthy of some attention... showing there's a cause behind this cause and reason behind the reason. Why is no attention paid to our management's data-driven approach? Our constant dedication to maximizing our impact? Why is there no focus on the collective reasoning and strategic decision-making that DOES occur within FORGE, and the diverse skill sets that influence each decision? I think it's pretty clear that dreams sell newspapers, but analysis and self-reflection builds results. I feel that FORGE is especially weak in bridging the two - we have failed at making our data-driven approach digestible and packagable to a wide audience. In this article, we're presented as dramatic whereas much of the criticism we've received is that we come off as overly academic. The balance is clearly tough for us to strike. I know that I didn’t sell my house and leave my job to pursue some lofty, naive dream – I made the conscious decision that FORGE was working on an important problem in a highly effective manner – that it had the model and the results that were worth my sacrifice and investment. I had worked with plenty of incompetent and misguided organizations, and saw FORGE as offering something radically different. The bottom line is that everyone in FORGE does this because we've been touched and affected by what we've seen on the ground in African refugee camps. Our hearts are tethered to the cause. However... we firmly believe that we can’t do any service to the cause without doing it in a smart, strategic, and self-critical manner. It's this balance of head and heart that is so important to us, and yet we are still failing to get across. Nicholas Talarico FORGE Board of Directors Hi Leanne. I have to say that I was also disappointed by the way we were presented in the article. It seems like the same thing has happened again… rather than focus on how FORGE as a whole considered the risks of this approach and weighed the benefits, the piece focuses on Kjerstin and an almost ‘dreamer’ mentality. There’s no doubt that Kjerstin is a ‘big picture’ idealist, but she’s also a highly-analytical, ‘prove the model,’ executive. That seems to be regularly lost in this story. I think the regression analysis posted by Kjerstin on The Social Edge is worthy of some attention… showing there’s a cause behind this cause and reason behind the reason. Why is no attention paid to our management’s data-driven approach? Our constant dedication to maximizing our impact? Why is there no focus on the collective reasoning and strategic decision-making that DOES occur within FORGE, and the diverse skill sets that influence each decision?

I think it’s pretty clear that dreams sell newspapers, but analysis and self-reflection builds results. I feel that FORGE is especially weak in bridging the two – we have failed at making our data-driven approach digestible and packagable to a wide audience. In this article, we’re presented as dramatic whereas much of the criticism we’ve received is that we come off as overly academic. The balance is clearly tough for us to strike. I know that I didn’t sell my house and leave my job to pursue some lofty, naive dream – I made the conscious decision that FORGE was working on an important problem in a highly effective manner – that it had the model and the results that were worth my sacrifice and investment. I had worked with plenty of incompetent and misguided organizations, and saw FORGE as offering something radically different.

The bottom line is that everyone in FORGE does this because we’ve been touched and affected by what we’ve seen on the ground in African refugee camps. Our hearts are tethered to the cause. However… we firmly believe that we can’t do any service to the cause without doing it in a smart, strategic, and self-critical manner. It’s this balance of head and heart that is so important to us, and yet we are still failing to get across.

Nicholas Talarico
FORGE Board of Directors

]]> By: Leanne http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream/comment-page-1#comment-5172 Leanne Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:38:59 +0000 http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/forge-goes-mainstream#comment-5172 I read the whole article last night. I was disappointed in what I read/discovered about FORGE as presented by the reporter. I'm still mulling it over but I would be interested in hearing if anyone else who was in on the FORGE experiment at the very beginning feels the same way. What I do know is that the article did very little to inspire confidence in FORGE. Instead of emphasizing the fact that Kjerstin was given money by her parents and boyfriend and was working out of her home for little pay with a less than stellar business plan, I would have preferred it if the reporter focused on the number of people served and the accomplishments FORGE had achieved. I came away thinking, "Hmmm. What a nice little idea this young girl, her parents, friends and boyfriend are helping her with." To me, it seemed that all the wrong things were emphasized and if I were just hearing about FORGE from the article I wouldn't be likely to help but rather hope that things work out. I read the whole article last night. I was disappointed in what I read/discovered about FORGE as presented by the reporter.

I’m still mulling it over but I would be interested in hearing if anyone else who was in on the FORGE experiment at the very beginning feels the same way.

What I do know is that the article did very little to inspire confidence in FORGE. Instead of emphasizing the fact that Kjerstin was given money by her parents and boyfriend and was working out of her home for little pay with a less than stellar business plan, I would have preferred it if the reporter focused on the number of people served and the accomplishments FORGE had achieved.

I came away thinking, “Hmmm. What a nice little idea this young girl, her parents, friends and boyfriend are helping her with.” To me, it seemed that all the wrong things were emphasized and if I were just hearing about FORGE from the article I wouldn’t be likely to help but rather hope that things work out.

]]>