<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Philanthropy Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/04/global-philanthropy-forum/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/04/global-philanthropy-forum</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Hawley</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/04/global-philanthropy-forum#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Hawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/04/global-philanthropy-forum#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>Sean, I appreciated your view of GPF, as I attended as well.  One of the greatest values is that high networth donors are really willing and able to grapple with issues that are very far away, and difficult to track.  Often the discussions could become demoralizing because the challenges are so very, very deeprooted.  Somehow, GPF is able to be strategic and tactically constructive; it is also able to measure/limit expectations.  And who can argue with the need that we have to do *something* when 70% of our world has an annual income of $800?

The difference here is a reality check of how difficult it is. What is not different is what can appear as overwhelming challenges to overcome....

all best, Pamela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I appreciated your view of GPF, as I attended as well.  One of the greatest values is that high networth donors are really willing and able to grapple with issues that are very far away, and difficult to track.  Often the discussions could become demoralizing because the challenges are so very, very deeprooted.  Somehow, GPF is able to be strategic and tactically constructive; it is also able to measure/limit expectations.  And who can argue with the need that we have to do *something* when 70% of our world has an annual income of $800?</p>
<p>The difference here is a reality check of how difficult it is. What is not different is what can appear as overwhelming challenges to overcome&#8230;.</p>
<p>all best, Pamela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.674 seconds -->
