<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philanthropy Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>It is a drag that readers who use feed readers are also often your most dedicated readers. However, Feedburner does offer a fair bit of info about which posts feed readers viewed/clicked on/forwarded, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a drag that readers who use feed readers are also often your most dedicated readers. However, Feedburner does offer a fair bit of info about which posts feed readers viewed/clicked on/forwarded, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson Lazar</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/12/philanthropy-reading#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google Analytics can be a great tool for learning about your readership, however, and I freely admit that I'm not completely up on the actual how-to of Google Analytics, I am assuming that this particular tool cannot actually measure how readers interact with the posts unless they read them on your site. I do most of my reading through Google Reader and only actually visit blog sites when I feel the desire to comment, to read the comments of others or when I want to link-back to the post. I guess those factors in and of themselves may say something, but there are many interesting posts that really get me thinking that Google Analytics may never pick up on because I didn't read them on the blog site itself. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google Analytics can be a great tool for learning about your readership, however, and I freely admit that I&#8217;m not completely up on the actual how-to of Google Analytics, I am assuming that this particular tool cannot actually measure how readers interact with the posts unless they read them on your site. I do most of my reading through Google Reader and only actually visit blog sites when I feel the desire to comment, to read the comments of others or when I want to link-back to the post. I guess those factors in and of themselves may say something, but there are many interesting posts that really get me thinking that Google Analytics may never pick up on because I didn&#8217;t read them on the blog site itself. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
