<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Hacking Philanthropy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Jones</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>the quality of mercy is not strained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the quality of mercy is not strained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/11/beyond-hacking-philanthropy#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Excllent. At the root level you also have to ask to what extent giving is best understood as a) investing b) tax deductible giving c) a way to create public goods as are taxes d) an expression of love d) a moral or religious obligation e) an expression of the holy spirit d) an exercise in will to power and ego gratification e) atonement for sin f) greenwashing
etc.

The frames we put around the topic of giving are very diverse. The more we can foment a discussion at that level, the better. "Hacking philanthropy" is both very creative as a lingusitic frame and unbelievably reductive and parochial. (Money and technology and MBA logic to not exhaust the human spirit or the enterprise of creating a better and more just world.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excllent. At the root level you also have to ask to what extent giving is best understood as a) investing b) tax deductible giving c) a way to create public goods as are taxes d) an expression of love d) a moral or religious obligation e) an expression of the holy spirit d) an exercise in will to power and ego gratification e) atonement for sin f) greenwashing<br />
etc.</p>
<p>The frames we put around the topic of giving are very diverse. The more we can foment a discussion at that level, the better. &#8220;Hacking philanthropy&#8221; is both very creative as a lingusitic frame and unbelievably reductive and parochial. (Money and technology and MBA logic to not exhaust the human spirit or the enterprise of creating a better and more just world.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.858 seconds -->
