<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charitable Bankers, Total Strategists, Britney Spears &#038; Kevin Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/12/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>I think that to some extent "community outreach" has become a cost of doing business rather than a profit center. In other words companies that do not support their community get punished by consumers, rather than outreach being viewed as a reason to shop somewhere.

While "Charitable Bankers" are not profit driven, the represent a source of capital that nonprofits can access on a regular basis, instead of needing to have a great "investment opportunity" that a Total Strategist would fund.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that to some extent &#8220;community outreach&#8221; has become a cost of doing business rather than a profit center. In other words companies that do not support their community get punished by consumers, rather than outreach being viewed as a reason to shop somewhere.</p>
<p>While &#8220;Charitable Bankers&#8221; are not profit driven, the represent a source of capital that nonprofits can access on a regular basis, instead of needing to have a great &#8220;investment opportunity&#8221; that a Total Strategist would fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlene Spencer</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/10/12/charitable-bankers-total-strategists-britney-spears-kevin-smith/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Sean,
Love the title.

I've wondered what my local bank's finacial/customer return was on their community outreach.  I imagine it to be some dollar to dollar ratio.

I don't wonder this about the people donating to various non profits, locally.  I assume an intrinsic value.

Interesting to notice.  We do need both!

Thank you for contributing!
Arlene



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,<br />
Love the title.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve wondered what my local bank&#8217;s finacial/customer return was on their community outreach.  I imagine it to be some dollar to dollar ratio.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t wonder this about the people donating to various non profits, locally.  I assume an intrinsic value.</p>
<p>Interesting to notice.  We do need both!</p>
<p>Thank you for contributing!<br />
Arlene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
