<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonprofit Name Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Gregg</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/07/nonprofit-name-debate/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>I meant to suggest that any name change would be very difficult... but that something like "community-owned" would be the kind of thing that would make sense if we were to seek a replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to suggest that any name change would be very difficult&#8230; but that something like &#8220;community-owned&#8221; would be the kind of thing that would make sense if we were to seek a replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/07/nonprofit-name-debate/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Trista, I agree. In a world driven by profit seeking, standing up and saying that an organization does not pursue profit is powerful. But I think it is only a starting point for defining what the sector stands for.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trista, I agree. In a world driven by profit seeking, standing up and saying that an organization does not pursue profit is powerful. But I think it is only a starting point for defining what the sector stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trista Harris</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Trista Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/07/nonprofit-name-debate/#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Sean,
I was at a conference yesterday and a comment that stuck out for me is that the word "nonprofit" focuses too much on what we aren't rather than what we are. I think a new name that identifies us based on what we are working towards has a lot more power and unites various sectors around a common goal.

Best wishes,
Trista
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,<br />
I was at a conference yesterday and a comment that stuck out for me is that the word &#8220;nonprofit&#8221; focuses too much on what we aren&#8217;t rather than what we are. I think a new name that identifies us based on what we are working towards has a lot more power and unites various sectors around a common goal.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Trista</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/07/nonprofit-name-debate/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>I'm confused, you suggest community owned organization in one comment and say it will confuse people in the other comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused, you suggest community owned organization in one comment and say it will confuse people in the other comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Gregg</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/nonprofit-name-debate#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/08/07/nonprofit-name-debate/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Thanks for citing me and linking to my blog... and yes, I think they were both me. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for citing me and linking to my blog&#8230; and yes, I think they were both me. <img src='http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
