<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Canales Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/07/jim-canales-interview/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/07/jim-canales-interview</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/07/jim-canales-interview#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/07/16/jim-canales-interview/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>It's great that Irvine is posting their grantee perception survey from the Center for Effective Philanthropy.  Others are doing it as well - Hewlett was the first, and a quick search also produces others like Surdna, Packard, Mott, and Lumina.  Important also to give these folks their due in being as transparent as possible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that Irvine is posting their grantee perception survey from the Center for Effective Philanthropy.  Others are doing it as well - Hewlett was the first, and a quick search also produces others like Surdna, Packard, Mott, and Lumina.  Important also to give these folks their due in being as transparent as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
